blank
blank
blank



ARTICLES BY SUBJECT
Material Handling
Warehouse Management
Facility Planning
Shipping
Third-party Logistics
Order Management
Bar Coding
RFID Systems
Contact Center/CRM
Call Centers
Returns Processing
Payment Processing
Packaging

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

RESOURCES
E-mail Newsletter
Calendar of Events
Archives
Catalog Age
Direct
ABOUT Logistics
NCOF
CLM
NRF
WERC

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
ABOUT US
Contact Editorial
Contact Sales
Contact Exhibitions
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
blank

Loose Ends

 Rama Ramaswami

Operations & Fulfillment, Aug 1, 2003

Print-friendly format E-mail this information

cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0>
cellpadding=>

Remember the days when fulfilling an order was a simple matter of throwing stuff into a box and taping it shut? Today's complex fulfillment processes make those idyllic times seem even further in the past. According to a report called “Grading Order Fulfillment Solutions” that Forrester Research Inc. released in June 2003, order fulfillment programs are now grandiose enough to span the entire supply chain. Among other things, they must coordinate customer history across companies, keep inventory visible at multiple stages and locations, integrate a plethora of applications, provide real-time information, identify distribution trends, and align fulfillment with corporate performance goals.

Phew! There aren't many vendors who can do all that. The report surveys 13 application providers and 102 executives with the authority to buy software. The vendors fall into four categories: pure plays, WMS, ERP, and supply chain planning. Pure plays comprise Escalate, Valdero, Viewlocity, Vizional Technologies, and WorldChain. The WMS group encompasses EXE Technologies, Manhattan Associates, Yantra, and Optum. ERP vendors include SAP and Oracle, while i2 Technologies and Manugistics form part of the supply chain planning group.

The Forrester researchers note that when choosing an order fulfillment solution, users look for long-term viability, the vendor's industry expertise, economical total cost of ownership (TCO), and functions that integrate with existing programs. Measuring the 13 vendors, the researchers conclude that all have varying strengths and weaknesses — an order fulfillment app may offer excellent transportation management capabilities, for example, but score poorly on integration. For most of the vendors, Forrester recommends adding partners, developing flexible and dynamic components, upgrading professional services, and reducing TCO. All this to pursue that elusive goal: providing an end-to-end order fulfillment solution.

Happy Endings

Order fulfillment solutions must integrate multiple enabling functions.

ORDER FULFILLMENT SOLUTION OMS

Capture orders

WMS

Check inventory availability

CRM

Verify customer priority for allocation

DP

Incorporate projected demand constraints

TMS

Check transportation availability

ERP

Receivables

Source: Forrester Research Inc.



© 2009, Primedia Business Magazines and Media, a PRIMEDIA company. All rights reserved. This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be reproduced, rewritten, distributed, redisseminated, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast, directly or indirectly, in any medium without the prior written permission of PRIMEDIA Business Corp.

Get Copyright Clearance Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2009, PRIMEDIA Business Magazines & Media Inc.

Print-friendly format E-mail this information
Search
blank
blank
blank

blank

  Which of the following systems do you plan to install in the next six months?
  WMS
  TMS
  CRM
  SCM
   
  View Results 
blank

blank
blank